Number System - Prove irrationality of sqrt(2) and sqrt(3) using contradiction-based reasoning
Review the key concepts, formulae, and examples before starting your quiz.
🔑Concepts
Rational Numbers: A number is called rational if it can be written in the form , where and are integers and . For the proof, we assume and are coprime, meaning .
Irrational Numbers: Numbers that cannot be expressed in the form are irrational. Their decimal expansions are non-terminating and non-recurring.
Fundamental Theorem Property: Let be a prime number. If divides , then divides , where is a positive integer.
Method of Contradiction: This involves assuming the opposite of what we want to prove (e.g., assuming is rational) and showing that this leads to a logical impossibility or contradiction.
Coprime Property: If two numbers and have no common factor other than , they are called coprime.
📐Formulae
💡Examples
Problem 1:
Prove that is an irrational number.
Solution:
- Assume to the contrary that is rational.
- Then , where and are integers, , and are coprime (have no common factors other than ).
- Squaring both sides:
- This means divides . By the theorem, if divides , then divides .
- Let for some integer . Substituting this in :
- This means divides , so divides .
- Therefore, and have at least as a common factor. This contradicts the assumption that and are coprime.
- Hence, is irrational.
Explanation:
The proof uses the property that if a prime divides the square of an integer, it must divide the integer itself. Finding a common factor of for both and contradicts our simplest-form assumption.
Problem 2:
Prove that is an irrational number.
Solution:
- Assume is rational. Let where are coprime integers and .
- Square both sides:
- Since divides , must divide .
- Let . Substitute into the equation:
- Since divides , must divide .
- Both and have as a common factor, contradicting that they are coprime.
- Thus, is irrational.
Explanation:
Similar to the proof, we demonstrate that both the numerator and denominator share a common factor of , which violates the definition of a rational number in its simplest form.