Review the key concepts, formulae, and examples before starting your quiz.
🔑Concepts
Rational Numbers: A rational number is any number that can be expressed in the form , where and are integers and . Visually, these numbers represent points on a number line that correspond to terminating decimals (like ) or non-terminating repeating decimals (like ).
Irrational Numbers: These are numbers that cannot be written in the form . Their decimal expansions are non-terminating and non-repeating. On a number line, irrational numbers fill the gaps between rational numbers to form the set of real numbers.
The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic: This theorem states that every composite number can be uniquely expressed as a product of prime numbers, regardless of the order. This uniqueness is critical when identifying common factors in proofs.
Divisibility Theorem (Theorem 1.3): Let be a prime number. If divides (where is a positive integer), then also divides . This logical step is the cornerstone for proving that square roots of non-square integers are irrational.
Co-prime Numbers: Two integers and are said to be co-prime if their Highest Common Factor (HCF) is . In irrationality proofs, we assume a rational fraction is in its simplest form, meaning the numerator and denominator share no common factors other than .
Method of Contradiction: This is a proof technique where we begin by assuming the opposite of what we want to prove (e.g., assuming is rational). We then use logical steps to reach an impossible result or 'contradiction,' proving the initial assumption was false.
Properties of Irrational Numbers: The sum, difference, product (with a non-zero rational), or quotient of a rational and an irrational number always results in an irrational number. Visually, adding a rational 'shift' to an irrational point on the number line results in another irrational point.
📐Formulae
💡Examples
Problem 1:
Prove that is irrational.
Solution:
- Assume is rational. Let where and are co-prime integers and .
- Squaring both sides: , which implies .
- Therefore, divides , which means must divide (by Theorem 1.3).
- Let for some integer . Substituting this into the equation: .
- This means divides , so must also divide .
- Since divides both and , they are not co-prime. This contradicts our assumption.
- Conclusion: is irrational.
Explanation:
This solution uses the method of contradiction by assuming the number is rational and showing that the numerator and denominator must share a common factor of 2, which violates the definition of a simplified fraction (co-prime).
Problem 2:
Prove that is irrational, given that is irrational.
Solution:
- Assume is rational. Let , where is a rational number.
- Rearrange the equation to isolate the irrational term: .
- Divide by : .
- Since and are rational, their difference is rational. Dividing a rational number by also results in a rational number.
- This implies is rational. However, it is given that is irrational.
- A rational number cannot equal an irrational number. This is a contradiction.
- Conclusion: is irrational.
Explanation:
This approach relies on the properties of rational numbers. By isolating the known irrational part on one side, we show that it would have to equal a rational expression, which is mathematically impossible.